Nikkor Z MC 50 mm f/2,8

[namzip]

Pas de bague non plus pour le Nikkor Z 50 f:1,4.
Il est à 449 euros alors que le micro Z est à 599 euros.
Ce n'est pas la même utilisation, rapport 1/1 pour le micro, grande ouverture pour le 1,4.

[Philou10]

Oui !

[Mistral75]

Essai du Nikkor Z MC 50 mm f/2,8 VR S sur Nikon Z 7 par Klaus Schroiff pour OpticalLimits :

Nikkor Z MC 50mm f/2.8 Review - OpticalLimits

Points forts :

• Léger et compact
• Piqué

Points faibles :

• Mécanisme de mise au point télescopique
• Fait un peu cheap
• Pare-soleil bizarre

Qualité optique : 8/10
Qualité de fabrication : 6/10
Rapport performances / prix : 5/10

The Nikkor Z MC 50mm f/2.8 is capable of delivering very good image quality. Images are sharp at f/2.8 and exceedingly so at f/5.6. Lateral CAs are negligible. However, axial CAs can be visible at large aperture settings. There is some vignetting and a tiny bit of image distortion but autocorrection handles most of this. The quality of the bokeh isn't perfect but pretty good in real life (unless your sample has an issue like ours).

While the lens is optically fine, there are question marks about the build quality, though. Yes, it's not an S-class lens but there's a lot of plastic here, and the extending focusing system is a bit ... meh. Also keep in mind that a working distance of just 5cm at 1:1 has compromises in terms of lighting and shooting live critters if that's your thing.

The Nikkor Z MC 50mm f/2.8 does the job but overall we'd rather suggest the Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S instead really.